-
February 25th, 2016, 07:01 AM
#1
Toronto Dog Bite Statistics
Interesting statistics, especially the reduced numbers of bites once the ban on Pit Bulls was originally implemented.
The law certainly succeeded in cutting bites by the four affected breeds — Toronto recorded only 19 in 2014, down from 112 in 2005.
It’s not surprising, since there are far fewer of them around to bite anyone — there were only 338 registered in Toronto in 2014, down from 1,411 in 2005. Also, since the dogs were supposed to be unable to breed starting in 2005, the remaining ones are becoming elderly. Gradually, they are dying off without being replaced. They should cease to exist in the city by 2020 or so, at least in theory.
from:
http://globalnews.ca/news/2527882/torontos-pit-bulls-are-almost-gone-so-why-are-there-more-dog-bites-than-ever/?utm_source=Article&utm_medium=EditorsPick&utm_cam paign=2015
-
February 25th, 2016 07:01 AM
# ADS
-
February 25th, 2016, 07:27 AM
#2
Looks like we should ban German Shepherds.
That is some informative reporting in that article !!
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
-
February 25th, 2016, 07:40 AM
#3
Has too much time on their hands
Would be good to also know the gravity of the bites per breed.
-
February 25th, 2016, 07:56 AM
#4

Originally Posted by
seabast
Would be good to also know the gravity of the bites per breed.
Bingo..the reason the Pit Bulls were signaled out.
-
February 25th, 2016, 08:30 AM
#5
i also noticed a new breed on the list
the american bulldog
let me venture to say that this is a replacement for the pitbull by
the unscrupulous type the same people that used to own the pits that bit
its the owners not the dogs
and as the article stated dog bites are rising
-
February 25th, 2016, 09:24 AM
#6
The problem as I see it is the term Pitbull and what that means for identification.The majority of people out there could not tell the difference between a pitbull and a can of corn.The breed Pitbull does not exist,it only describes a function the dog was breed for.
I like to re post this quiz many may have not seen before.
http://www.pickthepit.com/
In Toronto in 2004 there were 36,000 dogs.In Toronto in 2015 there were 230,000 dogs.
Last edited by Gilroy; February 25th, 2016 at 09:56 AM.
-
February 25th, 2016, 10:46 AM
#7

Originally Posted by
stragglelake
Looks like we should ban German Shepherds.
That is some informative reporting in that article !!
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
And yet "pitbulls" still exist in abundance, and are easy to get in Ontario. Yep, very informative..LOL
They must be breeding a new and improved type of "pitbull" that doesn't bite.
-
February 25th, 2016, 11:18 AM
#8
Canine Behaviorists have proven many times that dog aggression is NOT breed spcific.
This is a fact - studied and published by experts.
-
February 25th, 2016, 01:43 PM
#9
It's not a fact, and canine behaviorists have not proven it. Rather, canine ideologues have selectively quoted the research to promote their predetermined position. That some of those ideologues are behaviorists doesn't fix the problems with their argument.
The largest database of canine behavior -- C-BARQ -- has demonstrated that aggression is breed-specific. You are most likely to find aggression in small breeds and in herding breeds.
"The language of dogs and birds teaches you your own language."
-- Jim Harrison (1937 - 2016)
-
February 25th, 2016, 02:12 PM
#10
Has too much time on their hands

Originally Posted by
Roper
Canine Behaviorists have proven many times that dog aggression is NOT breed spcific.
This is a fact - studied and published by experts.
So how do you explain that Jack and G.S. are in the top 3 in 2004 and 2014, and I assume there are in the top 3 pretty much every years?
I grew up with few G.S. and I own one today and hunted with many Jacks, from my little experience there are friendlier breeds out there......
Last edited by seabast; February 25th, 2016 at 02:16 PM.