Page 8 of 12 FirstFirst 123456789101112 LastLast
Results 71 to 80 of 114

Thread: goodbye Hunting in Hamilton

  1. #71
    Has too much time on their hands

    User Info Menu

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Hunter John View Post
    I may be mistaken Dyth but I thought that's why the lady from the trap and shooting association was present , Otherwise why would she be there ?
    I can't really be sure but I would suspect the same as we all were, to get information.

    Here is the current by-law as it stands:http://www2.hamilton.ca/NR/rdonlyres...AB/0/05114.pdf

    It covers everything about discharging firearms and bows. In it there are stipulations about discharging firearms within 100m of a dwelling, etc. This should cover the urban sprawl issue. Unless they plan to change the by-law more than what they presented last night, there is zero reason for this change (especially the change from firearms and bows to weapons). Now when the house density gets too much to cover the stipulation for the 100m from a dwelling (ie a subdivision), then yea change the outline of the discharge areas on the maps.

    Dyth
    Last edited by Dythbringer; April 5th, 2016 at 11:27 AM.

  2. # ADS
    Advertisement
    ADVERTISEMENT
     

  3. #72
    Member for Life

    User Info Menu

    Default

    Could be Dyth but in talking to my neighbors brother in law last night whom is a long time member of Tamahawk many of them believe this is the beginning of the end for them . Time will tell I guess.

  4. #73
    Has too much time on their hands

    User Info Menu

    Default

    Hunter John,

    Please don't take my comments as I like what is happening. My BS radar was pinging constantly last night and the fact none of this is on the city's website raises my hackles. For years, the city hasn't been our friend and the comments from the mayor last year about the downtown shooting only strengthens that outlook towards us despite what the two councilors said last night. We have a city council who is looking out for urban Hamilton despite the city limits encompassing nearly 50% rural or rural type landscape. Why did this particular incident touch off a change to the discharge by-laws which have been working for 11 years? I think that question is very important but was glossed over by all three men. Couple that with the fact there were two uniformed police officers present means that whomever was in charge of this meeting wanted someone there to restore order, if necessary, to the meeting despite the previous meeting's orderly conduct. I think there are a lot of changes to this by-law which isn't being discussed and it will come as a surprise to all of us as it wasn't in the information meetings. I truly hope I am wrong here but I don't have faith otherwise.

    Dyth

  5. #74
    Just starting out

    User Info Menu

    Default

    it was presented in binbrook that clubs and ranges, and I asked about hamilton gun club, would be exempt from the changes.
    Not 100% sure on this but thats what came up in binbrook

  6. #75
    Just starting out

    User Info Menu

    Default

    x4 time to renew my membership

  7. #76
    Member for Life

    User Info Menu

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Dythbringer View Post
    Hunter John,

    Please don't take my comments as I like what is happening. My BS radar was pinging constantly last night and the fact none of this is on the city's website raises my hackles. For years, the city hasn't been our friend and the comments from the mayor last year about the downtown shooting only strengthens that outlook towards us despite what the two councilors said last night. We have a city council who is looking out for urban Hamilton despite the city limits encompassing nearly 50% rural or rural type landscape. Why did this particular incident touch off a change to the discharge by-laws which have been working for 11 years? I think that question is very important but was glossed over by all three men. Couple that with the fact there were two uniformed police officers present means that whomever was in charge of this meeting wanted someone there to restore order, if necessary, to the meeting despite the previous meeting's orderly conduct. I think there are a lot of changes to this by-law which isn't being discussed and it will come as a surprise to all of us as it wasn't in the information meetings. I truly hope I am wrong here but I don't have faith otherwise.

    Dyth

    Not at all Dyth , I know what you mean ,especially about the BS meter running hot.

  8. #77
    Needs a new keyboard

    User Info Menu

    BOW HUNTER
    08 Diamond Justice
    Exalibur Exomag

  9. #78
    Getting the hang of it

    User Info Menu

    Default

    This is really great information and a great example of hunters, OFAH and the community working together to get clarity and preserve our great tradition.

  10. #79
    Loyal Member

    User Info Menu

    Default

    Good job folks! Keep applying the pressure!


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  11. #80
    Needs a new keyboard

    User Info Menu

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Sean View Post
    This is really great information and a great example of hunters, OFAH and the community working together to get clarity and preserve our great tradition.
    I agree. I was there and will attend the may session. Great job on those who were there.

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •