-
May 26th, 2016, 10:55 AM
#111
Release any fish you know if over the line, keep any fish you feel is under if you like. You do whatever suits your fancy and I'll do what suits me.
I'm kind of thinking of building a fish micrometer in my boat so I can get down to thousands of an inch and win the argument if called on it.
-
May 26th, 2016 10:55 AM
# ADS
-
May 26th, 2016, 11:17 AM
#112

Originally Posted by
last5oh_302
Thanks, I'll keep that in mind next time it happens.

I could be running into a sting operation.

Yes you would not like to end up like the father and son jet ski team that decided I would make a great marker for their little race around the bay.......Remember the two OPP that had come out to "save me".. Well they were not even two minute away, and DSC works really well. Reckless driving or reckless operation of a watercraft, mean the same thing to your insurance company.
They were laughing after we chatted out on Lake Huron about coming to rescue me, they did not seem to have any "HA HA" when talking to the father and son. Oh and by the way.... I have Navagation lights and running lights on my Pontoon boat. Not that you would need the lights to see my 14 foot long fire engine red pontoons against the blue water on a very bright and sunny day.
Take the warning labels off. Darwin will solve the problem.
-
May 26th, 2016, 03:12 PM
#113

Originally Posted by
Monster29/66
the fine was tossed by the JP - Diver Duck I mean Perry Mason by the JP... I'm pretty confident I know what the MNR can and can't do But keep lecturing.
There have been at best 3 sitting days of court since the 23rd. No the charge has not been dismissed by a JP your friend in the boat won't have even made it to a first attendance as of yet, and I'm pretty confident you have no idea how the court system works by the statements you've made. Further to that, the MNR can not influence a PON that has been issued by another enforcement agency. I'm not going to argue this with you any further. It's clear you have no experience in the subject at hand.
-
May 26th, 2016, 03:29 PM
#114

Originally Posted by
diverduck
There have been at best 3 sitting days of court since the 23rd. No the charge has not been dismissed by a JP your friend in the boat won't have even made it to a first attendance as of yet, and I'm pretty confident you have no idea how the court system works by the statements you've made. Further to that, the MNR can not influence a PON that has been issued by another enforcement agency. I'm not going to argue this with you any further. It's clear you have no experience in the subject at hand.
The only way things happen that fast is when you plead guilty and pay the fine...saving everyone concerned a lot of time and energy.
Your right, story smells fishy
-
May 26th, 2016, 03:42 PM
#115
Again.
The laws are the laws, they are there for reasons. In this case to help protect declining Walleye pops, something people here participating in this thread complain about all the time. They also complain all the time about the lack of enforcement. I guess except when it happens to them or someone they know.
We can be charged for doing 103 in a 100
We can be charged for walking down the street with a cold beer on a hot afternoon
We can be charged for Jay walking
We can be charged taking pics of OOS fish.
If you or anyone you know happens to be fined for something you think is insignificant. Man up imo, take it "like a man". If Im ticketed for doing 105 in a 100 I might think the leo woke up on the wrong side of the bed, but guess what. I chose to speed, not going to whinge about it. Likewise if I forget the flashlight in my safety kit. My mistake, not going to whinge about it. And if Im ever ticketed for having a fish 15 min before the season opens at midnight, or slightly out of the slot. My choice, or my mistake (maybe my watch is 20 minutes fast)
Last edited by JBen; May 26th, 2016 at 03:45 PM.
-
May 26th, 2016, 03:56 PM
#116
Oh and Monster, only because it is kind of ironic. And you will have to trust me when I say I'm smiling as I type this. Through out, you and other have argued the OPP have far more important things to be doing.
Yet, you or your friend forced them to attend court if thats how it played out when they should have been doing what? Ah, yes been out there fighting the bad guys, keeping us safe. And why, because you or your friend screwed up, kept a fish a little too large. Had your friend maned up and thought to himself..wow that cop must be having a bad day, but yeah I did screw up, no ones fault but my own really.....
He wouldn't have wasted the JPs time, the tax payers dollars and that constable would have been doing what so many here argued.
Something more important
-
May 26th, 2016, 04:48 PM
#117

Originally Posted by
MikePal
Ha Ha ...so when you end up needing 911...don't bother calling..take care of it yourself.
I am such a renegade I actually ride my bike without a bucket :-)
-
May 26th, 2016, 04:51 PM
#118

Originally Posted by
JBen
Again.
The laws are the laws, they are there for reasons. In this case to help protect declining Walleye pops, something people here participating in this thread complain about all the time. They also complain all the time about the lack of enforcement. I guess except when it happens to them or someone they know.
We can be charged for doing 103 in a 100
We can be charged for walking down the street with a cold beer on a hot afternoon
We can be charged for Jay walking
We can be charged taking pics of OOS fish.
If you or anyone you know happens to be fined for something you think is insignificant. Man up imo, take it "like a man". If Im ticketed for doing 105 in a 100 I might think the leo woke up on the wrong side of the bed, but guess what. I chose to speed, not going to whinge about it. Likewise if I forget the flashlight in my safety kit. My mistake, not going to whinge about it. And if Im ever ticketed for having a fish 15 min before the season opens at midnight, or slightly out of the slot. My choice, or my mistake (maybe my watch is 20 minutes fast)
again, it doesn't bother you that we have all these restrictions place on us, that have no real bearing on the public good or safety? Ontario is the province fun forgot.
-
May 26th, 2016, 08:02 PM
#119
Here's what I think is funny about this. How many posts on here do we have about not enough enforcement and CO's and poaching ? And yet we are arguing that the fish and game act was enforced and someone who by law was poaching ( in possession of illegal fish ) was busted. Hope no one comes to fish the ganny for the salmon run when the port hope police will be doing patrols under the fish and game act lol
That rug really tied the room together
-
May 26th, 2016, 08:10 PM
#120
I find it absolutely pathetic that someone is that desperate that he needs to keep a fish 1/4 inch over or under the slot.