-
June 24th, 2016, 09:17 AM
#11

Originally Posted by
Dythbringer
So last year in 87 there was 1100 additional deer seals available and this year there are none? The fact 87 was the higher amount of additional deer seals per area last year doesn't seem right that there is zero now (1100 last year vs 0 this year). I really hope this is a mistake.
I will triple check but pretty sure there is none. If you like you can pm your cell number and i will txt you a picture.
-
June 24th, 2016 09:17 AM
# ADS
-
June 24th, 2016, 09:21 AM
#12
Has too much time on their hands

Originally Posted by
pbonura
I will triple check but pretty sure there is none. If you like you can pm your cell number and i will txt you a picture.
pbonura,
Lol. I wasn't doubting you at all or what is in the pamphlet. It seems odd that a WMU can have so many last year and zero this year without any step down between.
Dyth
-
June 24th, 2016, 09:39 AM
#13

Originally Posted by
Dythbringer
pbonura,
Lol. I wasn't doubting you at all or what is in the pamphlet. It seems odd that a WMU can have so many last year and zero this year without any step down between.
Dyth
I have friend who works for the city of hamilton and 87 had alot more deer than 79. Two additional bows tags and 2 additional gun tags in 79. Zero for 87.
-
June 24th, 2016, 12:21 PM
#14

Originally Posted by
Dythbringer
So last year in 87 there was 1100 additional deer seals available and this year there are none? The fact 87 was the higher amount of additional deer seals per area last year doesn't seem right that there is zero now (1100 last year vs 0 this year). I really hope this is a mistake.
Just got mine as well. PB is correct. No mistake.
None for 80 this year either.
Last edited by Species8472; June 24th, 2016 at 12:23 PM.
The wilderness is not a stadium where I satisfy my ambition to achieve, it is the cathedral where I worship.
-
June 24th, 2016, 01:19 PM
#15

Originally Posted by
Species8472
Just got mine as well. PB is correct. No mistake.
None for 80 this year either.
Yes. Called and actually called the mnr and switched my first choice to 87 from 79. They will have it on the web soon.
-
June 24th, 2016, 03:42 PM
#16
Alot of deer in both 80 and 87 I'm absolutely puzzled as to why no additional tags...
-
June 24th, 2016, 06:25 PM
#17
Just got my info package in the mail today.....
If I am reading this right....... it looks like they posted 78 C D & E twice...
Glad I have a friend that has some land there as my traditional hunting WMU have no extra tags...
I wish I knew their rational behind the cuts
"Everything is easy when you know how"
"Meat is not grown in stores"
-
June 24th, 2016, 07:47 PM
#18
Yes exactly frank I'm wondering what the rationale/science is behind these tag cuts in certain wmu. I'm seeing tons of deer around and I know the deer had an easy winter in southern Ontario I really don't get it.

Originally Posted by
fratri
Just got my info package in the mail today.....
If I am reading this right....... it looks like they posted 78 C D & E twice...
Glad I have a friend that has some land there as my traditional hunting WMU have no extra tags...
I wish I knew their rational behind the cuts
-
June 24th, 2016, 07:52 PM
#19

Originally Posted by
fratri
If I am reading this right....... it looks like they posted 78 C D & E twice...
Not posted twice. The first 500 for 78 CDE are "antlered or antlerless" and than there is a second block of 500 with a different hunt code that are "anterled only"
The wilderness is not a stadium where I satisfy my ambition to achieve, it is the cathedral where I worship.
-
June 24th, 2016, 08:00 PM
#20
Has too much time on their hands
None in 47 or 48 this sucks.....