Page 22 of 40 FirstFirst ... 1215161718192021222324252627282932 ... LastLast
Results 211 to 220 of 398

Thread: Carbon Tax increases NOT put on hold

  1. #211
    Member for Life

    User Info Menu

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by MarkB View Post
    I'd love to see Mr. O'Toole walk all over Trudeau and leave him in the dust, when it comes to handling this country ... it would be like having the Undertaker in the wrestling ring ... a Pee Wee Herman (Trudeau) in the other corner ... it would be fun to watch, and we all know who would win!
    Surely the Conservatives don't need to be embarrassed again in a ring, the last boxing match should have been enough.

    Erin O'Toole is not gong to make it, he can't even get consensus within his own party from everything from abortion to a carbon tax. He has no policies he can articulate to Canadians, is dead boring and very little hair.

  2. # ADS
    Advertisement
    ADVERTISEMENT
     

  3. #212
    Member for Life

    User Info Menu

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by MarkB View Post
    Man ... you just don't get it ... it's like talking to my teenager! Here, I'm gonna spell it out for you! Proceed to next line below.



    (1) Fighting climate change is good ... did you understand that point, if so nod! Good, let's go to point (2).

    R. I agree fighting climate change is good. Let's go to point #2.


    (2) One way of fighting climate change is incentivizing good behaviour, and penalizing bad behavior. Got it, once again nod ... and then proceed to (3)

    R. I agree ,let's go to point #3.

    (3) Taxation on it's own won't work well, unless the revenue is used to fight climate change, for instance to subsidize the implementation of energy reduction initiatives ... got it .... nod ... we are done our lesson for today ... I'm sure it was a lot for you to process.
    R. How do you know the revenue is not going to fight climate change? How do you achieve points 1 and 2 without 3.

  4. #213
    Member for Life

    User Info Menu

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by MarkB View Post
    Who's talking about affordability??? We are talking about a stupid tax, that does nothing but line Trudeau's pockets and pay for his chef and nanny. We are allowed to gripe about that ... as usual fishy twisting the point around! LOL ... you love being a troll.
    The trolls are actually the one's that call other folk's troll's.

  5. #214
    Member for Life

    User Info Menu

    Default

    JBEN

    Gilroy, yeah its kind of "crazy". One other huge difference between Nat Gas and propane.
    LNG: prices are regulated....To avoid huge swings and volatility.
    Prop: un-regulated so prices can soar over night. I don't recall the year, but it was a few before we moved here. People were paying $1,000/month to heat their homes.


    The only time I ever heard of folks paying $1,000.00 to heat their homes or do anything including almost nothing was then Ontario Hydro went off the rail's years ago and were sending folk's up north outrageous Hydro bills they have never racked up and stealing money out of their direct deposit accounts and then refusing to reimburse them. Of course this was the Hydro one that was supposed to have been sorted out by Mr. Harris. Who is not busy sitting on nursing home boards causing more disasters.

  6. #215
    Member for Life

    User Info Menu

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by MarkB View Post
    Yup, good solution there fishy ... let's tax people to the point where they can't afford their home, and have to move away ... yes, good one .... I'm sure even you socialists would love being forced from your home because of taxes. LOL.
    Have a look at the tax load put on you after the COMMON SENSE revolution in Ontario. The biggest rip off ever in Ontario history by the Golf Pro. What did he give us MPAC everybody to this day is getting ripped off, Hydro Reform more rip off,
    he fired 39,000 hard working Ontarians, downloaded costs to Municipal Government,........

  7. #216
    Member for Life

    User Info Menu

    Default

    Did some light googling. It occurred in 2013. I recall that $1,000 number because a few people in articles at the time (which I read in 2015) were saying that. large familes/houses? Don't know.

    Do know, it was a big thing, because when I seriously started researching cost and trade-offs of making the jump, I was crunching all kinds of numbers. What forced air electric would cost and assuming that would continue to go up. What baseboard electric, Oil Propane and even wood or wood supplement. Came across those articles when I was researching over 2015. Am I surprised people in the city never heard of the crisis? No, I mean..........when does life outside ever really become big news...And do note, I include myself in that.

    https://ottawacitizen.com/news/local...-energy-crisis
    https://www.castanet.net/news/Canada...rices-to-spike


    Still wonder if Harris had good ideas, but brutal execution in certain area's/things.
    Re MPAC.
    With house prices going through the roof in outlying area's, and medians <60. Can only imagine the levvies some are going to get hit with
    Last edited by JBen; December 15th, 2020 at 04:41 PM.

  8. #217
    Elite Member

    User Info Menu

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Gilroy View Post
    Surely the Conservatives don't need to be embarrassed again in a ring, the last boxing match should have been enough.

    Erin O'Toole is not gong to make it, he can't even get consensus within his own party from everything from abortion to a carbon tax. He has no policies he can articulate to Canadians, is dead boring and very little hair.
    The last boxing match saw the Liberal Majority Government be reduced to a Minority, which relies almost completely on the NDP Socialist/Communist support. I don't think Turdeau did well at all ... major erosion in his voting base.

  9. #218
    Elite Member

    User Info Menu

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Gilroy View Post
    R. How do you know the revenue is not going to fight climate change? How do you achieve points 1 and 2 without 3.
    Gil, you asked two questions ... since adding a carbon tax ... Canada's carbon emissions ... since 2009, it has been trending up ... here is data from your Liberals website ... no disputing it when even your proponents admit it:

    https://www.canada.ca/en/environment...emissions.html

    Second ... did you read what I said ... I said "Taxation ON IT'S OWN won't work well." Furthermore in my second point I agree that penalizing bad behavior is one way to fight climate change ... so I don't understand your question ... why are you assuming I'm saying 3 won't happen?? You just can't tax people and then spend the money on Liberal pension funds ... all that will happen is the cost of goods will be increased and so will salaries (inflation) to compensate ... you HAVE to put ALL that money back into projects (install more energy efficient equipment, more renewable energy projects, etc) for there to be a real impact to CO2 emissions.

  10. #219
    Elite Member

    User Info Menu

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Gilroy View Post
    The trolls are actually the one's that call other folk's troll's.
    Well, you're wrong on that one ... we all know Fishey Fish is a troll.

  11. #220
    Member for Life

    User Info Menu

    Default

    JB it stands to reason that 86%of the population would get 86%of the attention, be it politicians or media.
    Last edited by fishermccann; December 16th, 2020 at 12:58 PM.

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •