-
March 2nd, 2022, 11:20 AM
#21

Originally Posted by
Birdbuff
Actually no. Read back before the convoy hoopla started. Most mandates were on there way out. We were following the same pattern as most of Europe. Most people just needed patience.
Disagreeing with government has always been acceptable. Most convoy supporters should realize by now that disagreeing with the government was a non-issue. Illegally blocking borders and streets and promoting the overthrow of democracy was a no-no.
Losing sides often have their own unique interpretation of events to justify their actions.
-
March 2nd, 2022 11:20 AM
# ADS
-
March 2nd, 2022, 11:24 AM
#22

Originally Posted by
Badenoch
Losing sides often have their own unique interpretation of events to justify their actions.
And how do you propose disagreement to commence when people were striped with jobs and social safety net that they paid into for years?
Quietly in their backyard?
Sent from my moto g(8) power using Tapatalk
-
March 2nd, 2022, 11:28 AM
#23

Originally Posted by
newbiehunter
And how do you propose disagreement to commence when people were striped with jobs and social safety net that they paid into for years?
Quietly in their backyard?
Sent from my moto g(8) power using Tapatalk
There are many ways. Sitting in a truck in downtown Ottawa for three weeks honking your horn and refusing a lawful order to leave is not among them.
-
March 2nd, 2022, 11:29 AM
#24

Originally Posted by
Badenoch
There are many ways. Sitting in a truck in downtown Ottawa for three weeks honking your horn and refusing a lawful order to leave is not among them.
Which ways exactly?
Sent from my moto g(8) power using Tapatalk
-
March 2nd, 2022, 11:38 AM
#25

Originally Posted by
Birdbuff
Actually no. Read back before the convoy hoopla started. Most mandates were on there way out. We were following the same pattern as most of Europe. Most people just needed patience.
Disagreeing with government has always been acceptable. Most convoy supporters should realize by now that disagreeing with the government was a non-issue. Illegally blocking borders and streets and promoting the overthrow of democracy was a no-no.

Originally Posted by
Badenoch
Losing sides often have their own unique interpretation of events to justify their actions.
Why did they start lifting restrictions in Europe, did the science change there first? Or maybe it was because of a Christmas party and case#6029697/21.
273471082_4936923576350742_7148983020191664330_n.jpg
-
March 2nd, 2022, 12:21 PM
#26

Originally Posted by
GloHole
Just basic flu patterns related to the changing of the seasons.
-
March 2nd, 2022, 12:50 PM
#27

Originally Posted by
newbiehunter
Which ways exactly?
Sent from my moto g(8) power using Tapatalk
Joining a political party. Lobbying your elected officials. Protesting lawfully.
-
March 2nd, 2022, 01:36 PM
#28

Originally Posted by
Badenoch
Joining a political party. Lobbying your elected officials. Protesting lawfully.
How what makes the protest unlawful? It seems to me like all you need is for an elected official to say you are being unlawful for it to become unlawful.
-
March 2nd, 2022, 02:07 PM
#29

Originally Posted by
Badenoch
Joining a political party. Lobbying your elected officials. Protesting lawfully.
If you have lost all hope in your own party and cannot even keep a leader of the party because of waring factions within your next move is to cause anarchy in the street's. Capital one and Capitol two.
-
March 2nd, 2022, 02:21 PM
#30

Originally Posted by
Fox
How what makes the protest unlawful? It seems to me like all you need is for an elected official to say you are being unlawful for it to become unlawful.
Here is the Criminal Code definition.
https://laws-lois.justice.gc.ca/eng/....html#h-116101
Unlawful assembly
63 (1) An unlawful assembly is an assembly of three or more persons who, with intent to carry out any common purpose, assemble in such a manner or so conduct themselves when they are assembled as to cause persons in the neighbourhood of the assembly to fear, on reasonable grounds, that they
(a) will disturb the peace tumultuously; or
(b) will by that assembly needlessly and without reasonable cause provoke other persons to disturb the peace tumultuously.
Lawful assembly becoming unlawful
(2) Persons who are lawfully assembled may become an unlawful assembly if they conduct themselves with a common purpose in a manner that would have made the assembly unlawful if they had assembled in that manner for that purpose.