Page 3 of 6 FirstFirst 123456 LastLast
Results 21 to 30 of 53

Thread: The End

  1. #21
    Needs a new keyboard

    User Info Menu

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Birdbuff View Post
    Actually no. Read back before the convoy hoopla started. Most mandates were on there way out. We were following the same pattern as most of Europe. Most people just needed patience.

    Disagreeing with government has always been acceptable. Most convoy supporters should realize by now that disagreeing with the government was a non-issue. Illegally blocking borders and streets and promoting the overthrow of democracy was a no-no.
    Losing sides often have their own unique interpretation of events to justify their actions.

  2. # ADS
    Advertisement
    ADVERTISEMENT
     

  3. #22
    Apprentice

    User Info Menu

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Badenoch View Post
    Losing sides often have their own unique interpretation of events to justify their actions.
    And how do you propose disagreement to commence when people were striped with jobs and social safety net that they paid into for years?
    Quietly in their backyard?


    Sent from my moto g(8) power using Tapatalk

  4. #23
    Needs a new keyboard

    User Info Menu

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by newbiehunter View Post
    And how do you propose disagreement to commence when people were striped with jobs and social safety net that they paid into for years?
    Quietly in their backyard?


    Sent from my moto g(8) power using Tapatalk
    There are many ways. Sitting in a truck in downtown Ottawa for three weeks honking your horn and refusing a lawful order to leave is not among them.

  5. #24
    Apprentice

    User Info Menu

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Badenoch View Post
    There are many ways. Sitting in a truck in downtown Ottawa for three weeks honking your horn and refusing a lawful order to leave is not among them.
    Which ways exactly?

    Sent from my moto g(8) power using Tapatalk

  6. #25
    Borderline Spammer

    User Info Menu

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Birdbuff View Post
    Actually no. Read back before the convoy hoopla started. Most mandates were on there way out. We were following the same pattern as most of Europe. Most people just needed patience.

    Disagreeing with government has always been acceptable. Most convoy supporters should realize by now that disagreeing with the government was a non-issue. Illegally blocking borders and streets and promoting the overthrow of democracy was a no-no.
    Quote Originally Posted by Badenoch View Post
    Losing sides often have their own unique interpretation of events to justify their actions.
    Why did they start lifting restrictions in Europe, did the science change there first? Or maybe it was because of a Christmas party and case#6029697/21.
    273471082_4936923576350742_7148983020191664330_n.jpg

  7. #26
    Leads by example

    User Info Menu

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by GloHole View Post
    Why did they start lifting restrictions in Europe, did the science change there first? Or maybe it was because of a Christmas party and case#6029697/21.
    273471082_4936923576350742_7148983020191664330_n.jpg
    Just basic flu patterns related to the changing of the seasons.

  8. #27
    Needs a new keyboard

    User Info Menu

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by newbiehunter View Post
    Which ways exactly?

    Sent from my moto g(8) power using Tapatalk
    Joining a political party. Lobbying your elected officials. Protesting lawfully.

  9. #28
    Member for Life

    User Info Menu

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Badenoch View Post
    Joining a political party. Lobbying your elected officials. Protesting lawfully.
    How what makes the protest unlawful? It seems to me like all you need is for an elected official to say you are being unlawful for it to become unlawful.

  10. #29
    Member for Life

    User Info Menu

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Badenoch View Post
    Joining a political party. Lobbying your elected officials. Protesting lawfully.
    If you have lost all hope in your own party and cannot even keep a leader of the party because of waring factions within your next move is to cause anarchy in the street's. Capital one and Capitol two.

  11. #30
    Needs a new keyboard

    User Info Menu

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Fox View Post
    How what makes the protest unlawful? It seems to me like all you need is for an elected official to say you are being unlawful for it to become unlawful.
    Here is the Criminal Code definition.

    https://laws-lois.justice.gc.ca/eng/....html#h-116101

    Unlawful assembly

    63 (1) An unlawful assembly is an assembly of three or more persons who, with intent to carry out any common purpose, assemble in such a manner or so conduct themselves when they are assembled as to cause persons in the neighbourhood of the assembly to fear, on reasonable grounds, that they

    (a) will disturb the peace tumultuously; or

    (b) will by that assembly needlessly and without reasonable cause provoke other persons to disturb the peace tumultuously.

    Lawful assembly becoming unlawful

    (2) Persons who are lawfully assembled may become an unlawful assembly if they conduct themselves with a common purpose in a manner that would have made the assembly unlawful if they had assembled in that manner for that purpose.

Page 3 of 6 FirstFirst 123456 LastLast

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •