-
February 5th, 2016, 05:55 PM
#51

Originally Posted by
cuulguy
I drive Rigeline 2010 and it is very fuel efficient. The average consumption is 11-13L/100km, depends on outside temperature, in mixed environment (city/highway). Of course, I bough it for hunting and do not need use it for heavy work.
Actually my Dodge Ram averages @ 12-13 overall and will cruise at 10 on the highway. That's with a 5.7 Hemi and a 10,000 lb tow capacity. The new full sized trucks aren't your father's gas guzzlers.
I’m suspicious of people who don't like dogs, but I trust a dog who doesn't like a person.
-
February 5th, 2016 05:55 PM
# ADS
-
February 5th, 2016, 07:09 PM
#52

Originally Posted by
cuulguy
I drive Rigeline 2010 and it is very fuel efficient. The average consumption is 11-13L/100km, depends on outside temperature, in mixed environment (city/highway). Of course, I bough it for hunting and do not need use it for heavy work.

Originally Posted by
terrym
Actually my Dodge Ram averages @ 12-13 overall and will cruise at 10 on the highway. That's with a 5.7 Hemi and a 10,000 lb tow capacity. The new full sized trucks aren't your father's gas guzzlers.
One of my company trucks is a 2015 1-ton Sierra Diesel. It get 10L on the highway (cruise at 103) and 14L in town and combined is 12-13. It's got a 5,000 lb payload and tows umpteen thousand (it pulls my fifth wheel and the company mini-ex). The only real trade offs are upfront cost (that's a big one), it's a bit of a pain to park, and I suspect your Dodge probably rides nicer. Oddly the insurance is pretty reasonable as well - less than my wife's minivan. Things certainly have come a long way.
Last edited by Species8472; February 5th, 2016 at 07:15 PM.
The wilderness is not a stadium where I satisfy my ambition to achieve, it is the cathedral where I worship.