-
January 6th, 2019, 11:09 AM
#41

Originally Posted by
Gilroy
I was simply pointing out to Bushmoose that Liberals fought and died for Canada and the Conservative (Republican,s Presidents) decided deferment was a better course of action for them,as they sent off other,s son,s and daughters to die.Not the best analogy but one I think is pretty simple to follow even for you.Geeze
Not really, but you might as well follow your Lieberal talking points and inject Harris and Harper into the conversation....
-
January 6th, 2019 11:09 AM
# ADS
-
January 6th, 2019, 11:54 PM
#42

Originally Posted by
Gilroy
Liberal Terry Sheehan 19,582 44.75 +25.02 $59,074.57
Conservative Bryan Hayes 13,615 31.12 –9.28 $114,243.06
Amazing even in YOUR HOME RIDING the Conservatives manage to spend more money getting themselves defeated.LOL, LOL.
P.S Bush when you troll your political garbage as you seem to always and take threads off topic,keep expecting these rebuttals.
Rebuttal to what? Gilly, you're grasping at straws my friend.
-
January 7th, 2019, 09:09 AM
#43
Queen’s Park likely wastes more money throwing out spoiled food in it’s cafeterias every year. I’m good with showing some respect for our vets.
I’m suspicious of people who don't like dogs, but I trust a dog who doesn't like a person.
-
January 7th, 2019, 10:25 AM
#44

Originally Posted by
Bushmoose
Rebuttal to what? Gilly, you're grasping at straws my friend.
I feel sorry for you Bushmoose up there in the Soo and surrounded by a sea of Liberal supporters,come down here to Mississauga for a beer and you can be surrounded by more Liberal supporters.LOL
I bet by now your second guessing your decision to inject politics into your #8 post.
-
January 7th, 2019, 10:33 AM
#45

Originally Posted by
rick_iles
Not really, but you might as well follow your Lieberal talking points and inject Harris and Harper into the conversation....
Lets not depress the readers talking about these guys.
-
January 18th, 2019, 08:36 PM
#46

Originally Posted by
welsh
To look at it another way, if the Ontario government gave a %$*@ about veterans, they could fund mental health, employment, and housing services for veterans adjusting to civilian life, especially Afghanistan veterans at risk.
This is entirely within provincial powers and is sorely needed.
Instead, they have extended a symbolic benefit of negligible individual value to a large number of people, including those who are only veterans of the QM stores of reserve force Service Battalions. And the collective impact of that benefit on the SPA is important.
Tell me again how this is good policy. I need a laugh.
Sent from my SM-G930W8 using Tapatalk
This is an excellent point Welsh, our veterans deserve nothing but the finest in the areas of both physical and mental healthcare. I’m not worried about the money lost from fishing licence sales to these people, be it $360k or $5M.... these people have sacrificed much and deserve our gratitude as Musky has elaborated.
Let’s give them all they need by cutting funding to our bloated public service, fat teachers unions, welfare to those who are able to work, and all the rest of the deadbeats who have dragged the rest of us down and contributed to Ontario becoming a have not province.
-
January 18th, 2019, 08:43 PM
#47
Correct me if I am wrong, but isn't that the Federal Government's responsibility AKA Trudeau, the guy who gave a a Terrorist 10 million? If Ontario funded it than it would be expected that they fund everyone.

Originally Posted by
73hunter
This is an excellent point Welsh, our veterans deserve nothing but the finest in the areas of both physical and mental healthcare. I’m not worried about the money lost from fishing licence sales to these people, be it $360k or $5M.... these people have sacrificed much and deserve our gratitude as Musky has elaborated.
Let’s give them all they need by cutting funding to our bloated public service, fat teachers unions, welfare to those who are able to work, and all the rest of the deadbeats who have dragged the rest of us down and contributed to Ontario becoming a have not province.
"This is about unenforceable registration of weapons that violates the rights of people to own firearms."—Premier Ralph Klein (Alberta)Calgary Herald, 1998 October 9 (November 1, 1942 – March 29, 2013) OFAH Member
-
January 18th, 2019, 08:48 PM
#48

Originally Posted by
greatwhite
Correct me if I am wrong, but isn't that the Federal Government's responsibility AKA Trudeau, the guy who gave a a Terrorist 10 million? If Ontario funded it than it would be expected that they fund everyone.
See post 27.
Sent from my SM-G930W8 using Tapatalk
"The language of dogs and birds teaches you your own language."
-- Jim Harrison (1937 - 2016)
-
January 18th, 2019, 08:57 PM
#49
Seen it yes.
But if our provinces funds it, the same will be expected everyplace. It is still the Federal Government to fund. Technically a province can fund what ever it wants. At that point the federal can just sit back and save it's money.
So again whats your point. The Federal Government is suppose to fund it.

Originally Posted by
welsh
See post 27.
Sent from my SM-G930W8 using Tapatalk
"This is about unenforceable registration of weapons that violates the rights of people to own firearms."—Premier Ralph Klein (Alberta)Calgary Herald, 1998 October 9 (November 1, 1942 – March 29, 2013) OFAH Member
-
January 18th, 2019, 09:30 PM
#50
Veterans affairs is Federal jurisdiction. Never heard of Provincial military anything.
I’m suspicious of people who don't like dogs, but I trust a dog who doesn't like a person.